
Between initial Goods issue and physical receipt, goods are considered as being in transit in receiving plant from a Logistics point of view, but not from an accounting point of view as 107 books a regular goods receipt posting simultaneously with Goods issue. At that time, goods are considered as being received in receiving plant and not in-transit anymore. This is the standard behavior, but in our Brazilian sub, it is mandatory to book the goods receipt only when goods are physically received (meaning at 109 time but not at 107 time). Then later on when goods are physically received, V元2N on Inbound delivery for transaction type 109 (no posting). At that time, goods are considered as logistics stock in transit in Receiving plant in MB5SiT transaction. We are using cross-company STO N1 scenario (business function LOG_MM_SIT) where transfer of property occurs at Goods Issue: SAP simultaneously chains transaction types 683 Goods issue from sending plant (US for example) + 107 Goods receipt posted in receiving plant (Brazil for example). I allow myself to contact you as you seem to be one of the STO specialists under Brazilian context.

Materials Management Localization Scenarios Overviewįor post in Portuguese check out this link. This include you can find out issues regarding accounting posting and the famous balance error.įor more information on MM localization scenarios, check out our WIKI:.Where the KOMP and KONK will be filled.SE37>Function Module> CALCULATE_TAX_ITEM.For all calculation routines related to material movement can be see in this FM and it is where it starts the interface with FI.SE37>Function Module>J_1B_IM_TX_CALCULATE_TAX_NEW.So it is necessary to check your setting to find out why the taxes are different. As this is not hard coded the values can change from one document to another. Lots of customer open incident asking why the values do not match.Posting string (J1BTAX>NF>Inventory Management>IM Posting Strings) field ‘line item ID’ must be set as T or D.

